HomeВидеоигрыRelated VideosMore From: PsEuDoAnOnYmOuS ­­­

Warface: Bridges vs Bridges 2.0 performance difference | BENCHMARK

25 ratings | 851 views
This is detailed performance difference between the old and new PTB Bridges including 1% and 0.1% lows. For you who don't know what are 1% and 0.1% lows, here is a video explaining it very good: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6WgbfG_z-k&ab_channel=Bitwit I wanted to create better benchmark graphs, but it was really hard for me because I was creating these graphs for 1st time and I already lost too much time making them, I checked the numbers multiple times to assure myself that they are correct. Here is an another graph you might be interested to see: https://prnt.sc/gnfns0 Testing system: CPU: Intel i3-4150 @ 3.5 GHz GPU: AMD Radeon R7 260x 2GB (overclocked) RAM: 8GB 1333MHz DDR3 (1 stick) HDD: 1TB 7200RPM Music used: 0:08 - Kovan & Alex Skrindo - Into The Wild 3:17 - Unknown Brain - Roots (feat. Attxla) 6:16 - TARI & Yix - Bliss Special thanks to -Drumtrex: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjGfYysPxD7bcnW8w3GQHIA/featured?ab_channel=Drumtrex -KaZooM: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXzT2Pq67WWlgz3LC38dMjQ/featured?&ab_channel=KaZooM -*Mr.Fifty.Egy* -NerowTheBeast: https://www.youtube.com/user/NerowGamingHD [R]eBorn clan FB page: https://www.facebook.com/ReBornWarfaceClan/ Every donation is welcomed and appreciated: https://streamlabs.com/thepseudoanonymous
Category: Видеоигры
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Text Comments (14)
R. K. (1 year ago)
People need to stop complaining about optimisation if they dont know what they are talking about. This map was optimised in terms of textures and movement. It was optimised for the newer generation of graphics cards e.g. Nvidia 10**. Thats why the old bridges had higher FPS than the new one. On my 1080 I easliy get 200FPS stable without physics e.g. grenade explosions etc. About 170-180FPS in-action...
drdoom 751 And also higher fps means a lot, you can feel the difference between 100 and 200 fps very easy even on 60 hz. That is because even you will see the display showing only 60 fps, the input lag and response time would be much faster at higher fps. I need a picture to explain this, but I am sure there is topic somewhere if you google it.
+drdoom 751 I don't know about the GTX 10** series, but for my old AMD card it is unplayable on competitive level.
R. K. (1 year ago)
Just saying. :) Nice video bro, thanks :*
R. K. (1 year ago)
And also higher FPS is irrelative if your monitor refresh rate is lower than your in-game FPS...
r1me (1 year ago)
Soon you will ned gtx 1080 to play this game on low :/ thx Crytek for "optimizations"
sp00nf33d (1 year ago)
I mean you can play 67fps avg on high on a £115 GFX card that almost 4 years old and can be got now for about £45. Thats pretty good, you can probably get away with a £10-20 gfx card on low.
Nicolas Micaux (1 year ago)
Nice vid. You should have change graphic settings to remove scope white thing
Yeah, maybe I had to remove hud, but anyway this is more realistic scenario. :p
KaZooM (1 year ago)
Good Work Bro :)
KaZooM (1 year ago)
haha :) whenever u want, btw last kill was sick xD
Thanks bro, also thanks for helping!)
Like Csgo :/
Yes, it looks more like CS:GO. But it is nothing bad.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.